A consolidated Analysis of periodic Security Threat Assessment Reports January 2013 to January 2015
The
Security Threat Assessment (STA) is an incidence mapping and reporting
tool developed by the CLEEN Foundation with support from the McArthur
Foundation. The tool is designed to provide a panoramic view of the
security situation across the country as activities build up towards the
2015 elections. Between January 2013 and January 2015, we have
published nine STA reports which map the election environment over the
past 25 months. This aggregate report combines the 9 periodic STA
reports and present a weighed view of the environment for the 2015
elections.
The national aggregation of the STAs reveals that 11
out the 37 states and the FCT (representing 29.7%) are in red, 20 states
plus the FCT (56.8%) are in amber and only 5 states (13.5%) are in
green. The summary of the status of the 36 states and the FCT is
presented below:
• Red: Adamawa, Benue, Borno, Imo, Kaduna, Kano, Nassarawa, Plateau, Rivers, Taraba and Yobe.
• Amber:
Abia, Akwa Ibom, Anambra, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Ekiti,
Enugu, Gombe, Katsina, Kogi, Lagos, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Sokoto, and
Zamfara.
• Green: Cross Rivers, Jigawa, Kebbi, Kwara and Osun.
Overview of Security Threats
A. Initial Security Threats now resolved or over taken by events
a. The need for code of conduct against hateful speech (the Abuja Accord)
b. Merger of opposition parties and possible violent disagreement over leadership and candidates
c. Zoning of Candidates
d. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)
e. Intra-party contentions
f. Inter-party defections
g. Review of legal framework
B. Current National Security threats: Trends and Outlook
a. Insurgency
b. Hate and inciting speech
c. Communal violence and other localized conflict
d. Militant groups, vigilantes and youth thuggery
e. Proliferation of small arms and light weapons
f. Performance of security institutions
g. Fear of electoral manipulation
h. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)
i. Distribution of Permanent Voters Card (PVCs)
j. Postponement of the elections.
Recommendations
i.
Efforts to contain the insurgency in the northeast, and stop its
spread into other regions and states should be intensified; The
government, NEMA and security agencies should set up rapid response
strategy in the event of a crisis, both humanitarian and security,
especially around flash point areas;
ii. All political parties
and candidates should be encouraged to focus on the issues around the
election and avoid hate or inciting speech. There should be effective
monitoring to ensure that parties and candidates abide by the Abuja
Accord;
iii. The existence and prevalence of informal police
groups such as vigilantes across the country underscores the need for
collaboration between the formal and informal policing groups in the
country, provided there is a framework for such collaboration and
partnership. There is a need for mapping, identifying and capacity
building and the development of a code of conduct for these groups and
issues such recruitment, training, accountability needs to be addressed
in the Code of conduct;
iv. The Inter Agency Coordinating
Committee on Election Security (ICCES) must be seen to have synergized
response and approach to the perceived threats to security during the
election. They should pay special attention to the violence hotspots
with a view to ensuring that adequate resources are directed towards
contain them. It must also ensure that security officials deployed on
election duty are provided with adequate logistics, welfare and are also
held accountable for their performance;
v. INEC should be
more aggressive in its distribution of the PVCs and deadlines for
collection should be extended as much as practicable; INEC and security
agencies must work assiduously to ensure that IDPs are able to exercise
their franchise as much as is practicable, and that the location of
their camps are well secured throughout the process;
vi. INEC
should maintain transparency in its organisation and conduct of the
elections. Where it encounters challenges capable of impacting the
electoral process, this should be communicated promptly to stakeholders
and immediate measures taken to address the challenge.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Yeah, we are all so different that not even believe it. And this article that direct evidence - ask.naij.com. I for example do not particularly welcome too beefy men and women, because then they seem to me unreal and rough, stuffed with artificial additives.
Post a Comment